linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] x86/virt/tdx: Detect P-SEAMLDR and TDX module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68484e168226037c3a25b6fb983b052b26ab3ec1.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:30:39 +1200
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        reinette.chatre@...el.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        isaku.yamahata@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/21] x86/virt/tdx: Detect P-SEAMLDR and TDX module

On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 07:24 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 4/26/22 17:01, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 13:56 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On 4/5/22 21:49, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > > The P-SEAMLDR (persistent SEAM loader) is the first software module that
> > > > runs in SEAM VMX root, responsible for loading and updating the TDX
> > > > module.  Both the P-SEAMLDR and the TDX module are expected to be loaded
> > > > before host kernel boots.
> > > 
> > > Why bother with the P-SEAMLDR here at all?  The kernel isn't loading the
> > > TDX module in this series.  Why not just call into the TDX module directly?
> > 
> > It's not absolutely needed in this series.  I choose to detect P-SEAMLDR because
> > detecting it can also detect the TDX module, and eventually we will need to
> > support P-SEAMLDR because the TDX module runtime update uses P-SEAMLDR's
> > SEAMCALL to do that.
> > 
> > Also, even for this series, detecting the P-SEAMLDR allows us to provide the P-
> > SEAMLDR information to user at a basic level in dmesg:
> > 
> > [..] tdx: P-SEAMLDR: version 0x0, vendor_id: 0x8086, build_date: 20211209,
> > build_num 160, major 1, minor 0
> > 
> > This may be useful to users, but it's not a hard requirement for this series.
> 
> We've had a lot of problems in general with this code trying to do too
> much at once.  I thought we agreed that this was going to only contain
> the minimum code to make TDX functional.  It seems to be creeping to
> grow bigger and bigger.
> 
> Am I remembering this wrong?

OK. I'll remove the P-SEAMLDR related code.

-- 
Thanks,
-Kai