[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k0baw59j.ffs@tglx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:06:16 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
prakash.sangappa@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: Update semtimedop() to use hrtimer
Prakash,
On Mon, Apr 18 2022 at 18:51, Prakash Sangappa wrote:
> @@ -1995,7 +1995,10 @@ long __do_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf *sops,
> int max, locknum;
> bool undos = false, alter = false, dupsop = false;
> struct sem_queue queue;
> - unsigned long dup = 0, jiffies_left = 0;
> + unsigned long dup = 0;
> + ktime_t expires;
> + int timed_out = 0;
bool perhaps?
> + struct timespec64 end_time;
>
> if (nsops < 1 || semid < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2008,7 +2011,9 @@ long __do_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf *sops,
While at it, can you please replace the open coded validation of timeout
with timespec64_valid()?
> error = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> - jiffies_left = timespec64_to_jiffies(timeout);
> + ktime_get_ts64(&end_time);
> + end_time = timespec64_add_safe(end_time, *timeout);
> + expires = timespec64_to_ktime(end_time);
Converting to ktime first makes this cheaper:
expires = ktime_get() + timespec64_to_ns(timeout);
Less code lines and shorter execution time because adding scalars is
obviously cheaper than adding timespecs.
Now if you add:
ktime_t expires, *exp = NULL;
then you can do here:
exp = &expires;
> }
>
>
> @@ -2167,7 +2172,9 @@ long __do_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf *sops,
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> if (timeout)
> - jiffies_left = schedule_timeout(jiffies_left);
> + timed_out = !schedule_hrtimeout_range(&expires,
> + current->timer_slack_ns,
> + HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
> else
> schedule();
and this can be simplified to:
timed_out = !schedule_hrtimeout_range(exp, current->timer_slack_ns,
HRTIMER_MODE_ABS)
schedule_hrtimeout_range() directly invokes schedule() when @exp == NULL
and returns != 0 when woken up in that case.
> @@ -2210,7 +2217,7 @@ long __do_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf *sops,
> /*
> * If an interrupt occurred we have to clean up the queue.
> */
> - if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0)
> + if (timeout && timed_out)
and this becomes
if (timed_out)
> error = -EAGAIN;
> } while (error == -EINTR && !signal_pending(current)); /* spurious */
Hmm?
Done right, you should end up with a negative diffstat :)
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists