[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfc1ddc3-5db3-6879-b6ab-210a00b82c6b@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:39:24 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, snitzer@...nel.org, hch@....de, mcgrof@...nel.org,
naohiro.aota@....com, sagi@...mberg.me, dsterba@...e.com,
johannes.thumshirn@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
clm@...com, gost.dev@...sung.com, chao@...nel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, josef@...icpanda.com,
jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev, agk@...hat.com, kbusch@...nel.org,
kch@...dia.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, bvanassche@....org, jiangbo.365@...edance.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, matias.bjorling@....com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] zonefs: allow non power of 2 zoned devices
On 4/28/22 01:02, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> The zone size shift variable is useful only if the zone sizes are known
> to be power of 2. Remove that variable and use generic helpers from
> block layer to calculate zone index in zonefs
Period missing at the end of the sentence.
What about zonefs-tools and its test suite ? Is everything still OK on
that front ? I suspect not...
>
> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/zonefs/super.c | 6 ++----
> fs/zonefs/zonefs.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/zonefs/super.c b/fs/zonefs/super.c
> index 3614c7834007..5422be2ca570 100644
> --- a/fs/zonefs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/zonefs/super.c
> @@ -401,10 +401,9 @@ static void __zonefs_io_error(struct inode *inode, bool write)
> {
> struct zonefs_inode_info *zi = ZONEFS_I(inode);
> struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
> - struct zonefs_sb_info *sbi = ZONEFS_SB(sb);
> unsigned int noio_flag;
> unsigned int nr_zones =
> - zi->i_zone_size >> (sbi->s_zone_sectors_shift + SECTOR_SHIFT);
> + bdev_zone_no(sb->s_bdev, zi->i_zone_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> struct zonefs_ioerr_data err = {
> .inode = inode,
> .write = write,
> @@ -1300,7 +1299,7 @@ static void zonefs_init_file_inode(struct inode *inode, struct blk_zone *zone,
> struct zonefs_sb_info *sbi = ZONEFS_SB(sb);
> struct zonefs_inode_info *zi = ZONEFS_I(inode);
>
> - inode->i_ino = zone->start >> sbi->s_zone_sectors_shift;
> + inode->i_ino = bdev_zone_no(sb->s_bdev, zone->start);
> inode->i_mode = S_IFREG | sbi->s_perm;
>
> zi->i_ztype = type;
> @@ -1647,7 +1646,6 @@ static int zonefs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> * interface constraints.
> */
> sb_set_blocksize(sb, bdev_zone_write_granularity(sb->s_bdev));
> - sbi->s_zone_sectors_shift = ilog2(bdev_zone_sectors(sb->s_bdev));
> sbi->s_uid = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID;
> sbi->s_gid = GLOBAL_ROOT_GID;
> sbi->s_perm = 0640;
> diff --git a/fs/zonefs/zonefs.h b/fs/zonefs/zonefs.h
> index 7b147907c328..2d5ea3be3a8e 100644
> --- a/fs/zonefs/zonefs.h
> +++ b/fs/zonefs/zonefs.h
> @@ -175,7 +175,6 @@ struct zonefs_sb_info {
> kgid_t s_gid;
> umode_t s_perm;
> uuid_t s_uuid;
> - unsigned int s_zone_sectors_shift;
>
> unsigned int s_nr_files[ZONEFS_ZTYPE_MAX];
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists