linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] mm/vmscan: activate swap-backed executable folios after first usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b41d51c2-5ff9-024e-34ff-0c9652f30a1c@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:36:38 +0800
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     "ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] mm/vmscan: activate swap-backed executable folios
 after first usage

On 2022/4/27 14:10, ying.huang@...el.com wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-04-27 at 13:08 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> 2022년 4월 26일 (화) 오후 3:58, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>님이 작성:
>>>
>>> On 2022/4/26 10:02, ying.huang@...el.com wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 14:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 19:12:29 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We should activate swap-backed executable folios (e.g. tmpfs) after first
>>>>>> usage so that executable code gets yet better chance to stay in memory.
>>
>> Missing activation for swap-backed executable page is the intended operation.
>> So, I disagree with this patch until some numbers are provided.
>> See following discussion.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200316161208.GB67986@cmpxchg.org/T/#u
> 
> Thanks for your pointer.  Now I understood more about this.  I agree to
> keep the original behavior unless we can prove the change with numbers.
> 

Many thanks both! I will keep the original behavior. :)

> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
> 
> 
> .
>