[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmjktXZDb5ELR8Xp@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:37:41 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Manjunatha Venkatesh <manjunatha.venkatesh@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"mb@...htnvm.io" <mb@...htnvm.io>,
"ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com" <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
"arnd@...db.d" <arnd@...db.d>, "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"javier@...igon.com" <javier@...igon.com>,
"mikelley@...rosoft.com" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"sunilmut@...rosoft.com" <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"rvmanjumce@...il.com" <rvmanjumce@...il.com>,
Ashish Deshpande <ashish.deshpande@....com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] Uwb: Nxp: sr1xx: Uwb driver support for sr1xx
series chip
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:24:14AM +0000, Manjunatha Venkatesh wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> Thanks for sharing your comments with us and apologies for our delayed
> response.
> We have done a thorough review internally and would like to put forward a
> proposal for your consideration.
>
> 1) In our next submission we will define the kernel/user API clearly with
> kernel pre-defined IOCTL macros in the uapi header file and follow the
> standard IOCTL rules.
Why do you need ioctls at all? Anyway, submit the code and we can
review the api then, I have no recollection of the previous submission
as it was thousands of patches ago.
> 2) We agree that this is a simple driver which may not need a dedicated
> directory under Linux/drivers so we will move the driver to "misc" folder.
> 3) We can also share some applications which show the usage of these driver
> API's from the user space.
That's great, submit away!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists