[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e02112a-317c-e95b-e0d3-7ed2c74c3509@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 07:11:18 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <p.yadav@...com>, <chentsung@...omium.org>
CC: <michael@...le.cc>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
<vigneshr@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: core: Check written SR value in
spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check()
On 1/31/22 19:19, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 26/01/22 03:32PM, Chen-Tsung Hsieh wrote:
>> Read back Status Register 1 to ensure that the written byte match the
>> received value and return -EIO if read back test failed.
>>
>> Without this patch, spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check() only check the
>> second half of the 16bit. It causes errors like spi_nor_sr_unlock()
>> return success incorrectly when spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check()
>> doesn't write SR successfully.
>>
>> Fixes: 39d1e3340c73 ("mtd: spi-nor: Fix clearing of QE bit on lock()/unlock()")
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Tsung Hsieh <chentsung@...omium.org>
>
> I don't know much about this bit of code but this patch looks fine to me
> from the surface. Would be nice to hear from Tudor about this too since
> he added the function.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>
> Acked-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists