[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874k2fyopx.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:23:06 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Nitesh Lal <nilal@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alex Belits <abelits@...its.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Oscar Shiang <oscar0225@...email.tw>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v12 12/13] mm: vmstat_refresh: avoid queueing work item
if cpu stats are clean
On Tue, Mar 15 2022 at 12:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> /*
> * The regular update, every sysctl_stat_interval, may come later
> @@ -1948,9 +1977,19 @@ int vmstat_refresh(struct ctl_table *tab
> * transiently negative values, report an error here if any of
> * the stats is negative, so we know to go looking for imbalance.
> */
> - err = schedule_on_each_cpu(refresh_vm_stats);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + cpus_read_lock();
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(works, cpu);
> +
> + INIT_WORK(work, refresh_vm_stats);
> + if (need_update(cpu) || need_drain_remote_zones(cpu))
Of course that makes sense in general, but now you have two ways of
deciding whether updating this is required.
1) The above
2) The per CPU boolean which tells whether vmstats are dirty or not.
Can we have a third method perhaps?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists