lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ymj3zzjQ9PwYaX/p@eldamar.lan>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:59:11 +0200
From:   Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
To:     Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     Dusty Mabe <dustymabe@...hat.com>, Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, x86@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: irq/urgent] PCI/MSI: Mask MSI-X vectors only on success

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 09:29:53PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:04:55PM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 3/14/22 12:49, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > 
> > > I've added Dusty to Cc, as he (and others) already have been dealing
> > > with this issue AFAICT.
> > > 
> > > Dusty, could you perhaps chime in with the latest status? AFAIU, it's
> > > related to potential issues with the Xen version used on these systems?
> > 
> > Thanks Stefan,
> > 
> > Yes. My understanding is that the issue is because AWS is using older versions
> > of Xen. They are in the process of updating their fleet to a newer version of
> > Xen so the change introduced with Stefan's commit isn't an issue any longer.
> > 
> > I think the changes are scheduled to be completed in the next 10-12 weeks. For
> > now we are carrying a revert in the Fedora Kernel.
> > 
> > You can follow this Fedora CoreOS issue if you'd like to know more about when
> > the change lands in their backend. We work closely with one of their partner
> > engineers and he keeps us updated. https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1066
> > 
> > Dusty
> 
> Thanks for the link and explanation. What a fun coincidence that we hit this in
> Flatcar Container Linux as well. We've reverted the commit in our kernels for
> the time being, and will track that issue.

Does someone knows here on current state of the AWS instances using
the older Xen version which causes the issues?

AFAIU upstream is not planning to revert 83dbf898a2d4 ("PCI/MSI: Mask
MSI-X vectors only on success") as it fixed a bug. Now several
downstream distros do carry a revert of this commit, which I believe
is an unfortunate situation and wonder if this can be addressed
upstream to deal with the AWS m4.large instance issues.

Regards,
Salvatore

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ