lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 05:56:43 -0500
From:   john.p.donnelly@...cle.com
To:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
        boqun.feng@...il.com, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 1/1] Revert "locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling
 more consistent"

This reverts commit 76723ed1fb8922ee94089e7432b8a262e3a06ed7.

This commit has introduced frequent system hangs running "fio test 
suite" on a variety of filesystem types on LVM volumes composed of four 
nvme devices.

This issue was first encountered in Linux 5.15.30, and later in Linux 
5.17.y.

Each panic includes the rwsem_down_write_slowpath() :

ext4:

PID: 3682   TASK: ffff8f489ae34bc0  CPU: 2   COMMAND: "dio/dm-0"
  #0 [fffffe0000083e50] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffff828772b3
  #1 [fffffe0000083e58] nmi_handle at ffffffff82840778
  #2 [fffffe0000083ea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffff8337a1e2
  #3 [fffffe0000083ec8] exc_nmi at ffffffff8337a48d
  #4 [fffffe0000083ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff8340153b
     [exception RIP: _raw_spin_lock_irq+23]
     RIP: ffffffff8338b2e7  RSP: ffff9c4409b47c78  RFLAGS: 00000046
     RAX: 0000000000000000  RBX: ffff8f489ae34bc0  RCX: 0000000000000000
     RDX: 0000000000000001  RSI: 0000000000000000  RDI: ffff8f47f7b90104
     RBP: ffff9c4409b47d20   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 0000000000000000
     R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff8f47f7b90104
     R13: ffff9c4409b47cb0  R14: ffff8f47f7b900f0  R15: 0000000000000000
     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
  #5 [ffff9c4409b47c78] _raw_spin_lock_irq at ffffffff8338b2e7
  #6 [ffff9c4409b47c78] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff82925be9
  #7 [ffff9c4409b47d28] ext4_map_blocks at ffffffffc11c26dc [ext4]
  #8 [ffff9c4409b47d98] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents at
ffffffffc11ad9e0 [ext4]
  #9 [ffff9c4409b47df0] ext4_dio_write_end_io at ffffffffc11b22aa [ext4]

xfs:

PID: 3719   TASK: ffff9f81d2d74bc0  CPU: 37  COMMAND: "dio/dm-0"
  #0 [fffffe0000894e50] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffffad6772b3
  #1 [fffffe0000894e58] nmi_handle at ffffffffad640778
  #2 [fffffe0000894ea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffffae17a1e2
  #3 [fffffe0000894ec8] exc_nmi at ffffffffae17a48d
  #4 [fffffe0000894ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffae20153b
     [exception RIP: _raw_spin_lock_irq+23]
     RIP: ffffffffae18b2e7  RSP: ffffbb7ec9637c48  RFLAGS: 00000046
     RAX: 0000000000000000  RBX: ffff9f81d2d74bc0  RCX: 0000000000000000
     RDX: 0000000000000001  RSI: 0000000000000000  RDI: ffff9f81c04a918c
     RBP: ffffbb7ec9637ce8   R8: 0000000000000000   R9: 0000000000000000
     R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff9f81c04a918c
     R13: ffffbb7ec9637c80  R14: ffff9f81c04a9178  R15: 0000000000000000
     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
     <NMI exception stack> ---
  #5 [ffffbb7ec9637c48] _raw_spin_lock_irq at ffffffffae18b2e7
  #6 [ffffbb7ec9637c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffffad725be9
  #7 [ffffbb7ec9637cf0] xfs_trans_alloc_inode at ffffffffc074f2bd [xfs]
  #8 [ffffbb7ec9637d50] xfs_iomap_write_unwritten at ffffffffc073ad15

Reported-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.jo.lopez@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.jo.lopez@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Vogel <jack.vogel@...cle.com>
---
  kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 171 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
index e63f740c2cc8..29eea50a3e67 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -106,9 +106,9 @@
   * atomic_long_cmpxchg() will be used to obtain writer lock.
   *
   * There are three places where the lock handoff bit may be set or 
cleared.
- * 1) rwsem_mark_wake() for readers		-- set, clear
- * 2) rwsem_try_write_lock() for writers	-- set, clear
- * 3) rwsem_del_waiter()			-- clear
+ * 1) rwsem_mark_wake() for readers.
+ * 2) rwsem_try_write_lock() for writers.
+ * 3) Error path of rwsem_down_write_slowpath().
   *
   * For all the above cases, wait_lock will be held. A writer must also
   * be the first one in the wait_list to be eligible for setting the 
handoff
@@ -335,9 +335,6 @@ struct rwsem_waiter {
  	struct task_struct *task;
  	enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
  	unsigned long timeout;
-
-	/* Writer only, not initialized in reader */
-	bool handoff_set;
  };
  #define rwsem_first_waiter(sem) \
  	list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list)
@@ -348,6 +345,12 @@ enum rwsem_wake_type {
  	RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED	/* Waker thread holds the read lock */
  };
  +enum writer_wait_state {
+	WRITER_NOT_FIRST,	/* Writer is not first in wait list */
+	WRITER_FIRST,		/* Writer is first in wait list     */
+	WRITER_HANDOFF		/* Writer is first & handoff needed */
+};
+
  /*
   * The typical HZ value is either 250 or 1000. So set the minimum waiting
   * time to at least 4ms or 1 jiffy (if it is higher than 4ms) in the wait
@@ -363,31 +366,6 @@ enum rwsem_wake_type {
   */
  #define MAX_READERS_WAKEUP	0x100
  -static inline void
-rwsem_add_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct rwsem_waiter *waiter)
-{
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
-	list_add_tail(&waiter->list, &sem->wait_list);
-	/* caller will set RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS */
-}
-
-/*
- * Remove a waiter from the wait_list and clear flags.
- *
- * Both rwsem_mark_wake() and rwsem_try_write_lock() contain a full 
'copy' of
- * this function. Modify with care.
- */
-static inline void
-rwsem_del_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct rwsem_waiter *waiter)
-{
-	lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
-	list_del(&waiter->list);
-	if (likely(!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
-		return;
-
-	atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF | RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
-}
-
  /*
   * handle the lock release when processes blocked on it that can now run
   * - if we come here from up_xxxx(), then the RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS bit must
@@ -399,8 +377,6 @@ rwsem_del_waiter(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct 
rwsem_waiter *waiter)
   *   preferably when the wait_lock is released
   * - woken process blocks are discarded from the list after having 
task zeroed
   * - writers are only marked woken if downgrading is false
- *
- * Implies rwsem_del_waiter() for all woken readers.
   */
  static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
  			    enum rwsem_wake_type wake_type,
@@ -515,25 +491,18 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
   	adjustment = woken * RWSEM_READER_BIAS - adjustment;
  	lockevent_cond_inc(rwsem_wake_reader, woken);
-
-	oldcount = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
  	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
-		/*
-		 * Combined with list_move_tail() above, this implies
-		 * rwsem_del_waiter().
-		 */
+		/* hit end of list above */
  		adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
-		if (oldcount & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)
-			adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
-	} else if (woken) {
-		/*
-		 * When we've woken a reader, we no longer need to force
-		 * writers to give up the lock and we can clear HANDOFF.
-		 */
-		if (oldcount & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)
-			adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
  	}
  +	/*
+	 * When we've woken a reader, we no longer need to force writers
+	 * to give up the lock and we can clear HANDOFF.
+	 */
+	if (woken && (atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF))
+		adjustment -= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
+
  	if (adjustment)
  		atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count);
  @@ -564,12 +533,12 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore 
*sem,
   * race conditions between checking the rwsem wait list and setting the
   * sem->count accordingly.
   *
- * Implies rwsem_del_waiter() on success.
+ * If wstate is WRITER_HANDOFF, it will make sure that either the handoff
+ * bit is set or the lock is acquired with handoff bit cleared.
   */
  static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
-					struct rwsem_waiter *waiter)
+					enum writer_wait_state wstate)
  {
-	bool first = rwsem_first_waiter(sem) == waiter;
  	long count, new;
   	lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
@@ -578,19 +547,13 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct 
rw_semaphore *sem,
  	do {
  		bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF);
  -		if (has_handoff) {
-			if (!first)
-				return false;
-
-			/* First waiter inherits a previously set handoff bit */
-			waiter->handoff_set = true;
-		}
+		if (has_handoff && wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST)
+			return false;
   		new = count;
   		if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
-			if (has_handoff || (!rt_task(waiter->task) &&
-					    !time_after(jiffies, waiter->timeout)))
+			if (has_handoff || (wstate != WRITER_HANDOFF))
  				return false;
   			new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
@@ -607,17 +570,9 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct 
rw_semaphore *sem,
  	 * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or
  	 * set the handoff bit.
  	 */
-	if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF) {
-		waiter->handoff_set = true;
-		lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff);
+	if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)
  		return false;
-	}
  -	/*
-	 * Have rwsem_try_write_lock() fully imply rwsem_del_waiter() on
-	 * success.
-	 */
-	list_del(&waiter->list);
  	rwsem_set_owner(sem);
  	return true;
  }
@@ -998,7 +953,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, 
long count, unsigned int stat
  		}
  		adjustment += RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
  	}
-	rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter);
+	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
   	/* we're now waiting on the lock, but no longer actively locking */
  	count = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count);
@@ -1044,7 +999,11 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, 
long count, unsigned int stat
  	return sem;
   out_nolock:
-	rwsem_del_waiter(sem, &waiter);
+	list_del(&waiter.list);
+	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
+		atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS|RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF,
+				   &sem->count);
+	}
  	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
  	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
  	lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fail);
@@ -1058,7 +1017,9 @@ static struct rw_semaphore *
  rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
  {
  	long count;
+	enum writer_wait_state wstate;
  	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
+	struct rw_semaphore *ret = sem;
  	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
   	/* do optimistic spinning and steal lock if possible */
@@ -1074,13 +1035,16 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore 
*sem, int state)
  	waiter.task = current;
  	waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE;
  	waiter.timeout = jiffies + RWSEM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
-	waiter.handoff_set = false;
   	raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-	rwsem_add_waiter(sem, &waiter);
+
+	/* account for this before adding a new element to the list */
+	wstate = list_empty(&sem->wait_list) ? WRITER_FIRST : WRITER_NOT_FIRST;
+
+	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
   	/* we're now waiting on the lock */
-	if (rwsem_first_waiter(sem) != &waiter) {
+	if (wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST) {
  		count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
   		/*
@@ -1116,16 +1080,13 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore 
*sem, int state)
  	/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
  	set_current_state(state);
  	for (;;) {
-		if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, &waiter)) {
+		if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, wstate)) {
  			/* rwsem_try_write_lock() implies ACQUIRE on success */
  			break;
  		}
   		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
  -		if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
-			goto out_nolock;
-
  		/*
  		 * After setting the handoff bit and failing to acquire
  		 * the lock, attempt to spin on owner to accelerate lock
@@ -1134,7 +1095,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore 
*sem, int state)
  		 * In this case, we attempt to acquire the lock again
  		 * without sleeping.
  		 */
-		if (waiter.handoff_set) {
+		if (wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF) {
  			enum owner_state owner_state;
   			preempt_disable();
@@ -1145,26 +1106,66 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore 
*sem, int state)
  				goto trylock_again;
  		}
  -		schedule();
-		lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer);
-		set_current_state(state);
+		/* Block until there are no active lockers. */
+		for (;;) {
+			if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
+				goto out_nolock;
+
+			schedule();
+			lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer);
+			set_current_state(state);
+			/*
+			 * If HANDOFF bit is set, unconditionally do
+			 * a trylock.
+			 */
+			if (wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF)
+				break;
+
+			if ((wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST) &&
+			    (rwsem_first_waiter(sem) == &waiter))
+				wstate = WRITER_FIRST;
+
+			count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
+			if (!(count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK))
+				break;
+
+			/*
+			 * The setting of the handoff bit is deferred
+			 * until rwsem_try_write_lock() is called.
+			 */
+			if ((wstate == WRITER_FIRST) && (rt_task(current) ||
+			    time_after(jiffies, waiter.timeout))) {
+				wstate = WRITER_HANDOFF;
+				lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_handoff);
+				break;
+			}
+		}
  trylock_again:
  		raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
  	}
  	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+	list_del(&waiter.list);
  	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
  	lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock);
-	return sem;
+
+	return ret;
   out_nolock:
  	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
  	raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
-	rwsem_del_waiter(sem, &waiter);
-	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+	list_del(&waiter.list);
+
+	if (unlikely(wstate == WRITER_HANDOFF))
+		atomic_long_add(-RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF,  &sem->count);
+
+	if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+		atomic_long_andnot(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
+	else
  		rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
  	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
  	wake_up_q(&wake_q);
  	lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_fail);
+
  	return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
  }
  -- 2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ