lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmkrCYZxG6cbCPGq@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 13:37:45 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        jolsa@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, like.xu.linux@...il.com,
        eranian@...gle.com, puwen@...on.cn, ananth.narayan@....com,
        ravi.bangoria@....com, santosh.shukla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] perf/x86/amd/core: Add AMD PerfMonV2 support

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 05:01:42PM +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Sandipan Das (7):
>   x86/cpufeatures: Add PerfMonV2 feature bit
>   x86/msr: Add PerfCntrGlobal* registers
>   perf/x86/amd/core: Detect PerfMonV2 support
>   perf/x86/amd/core: Detect available counters
>   perf/x86/amd/core: Add PerfMonV2 counter control
>   perf/x86/amd/core: Add PerfMonV2 overflow handling
>   kvm: x86/cpuid: Fix CPUID leaf 0xA
> 
>  arch/x86/events/amd/core.c         | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h   |   5 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h  |  17 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c    |   1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c               |   5 +
>  6 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst

Don't get discouraged - or impatient
------------------------------------

After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait.  Reviewers are
busy people and may not get to your patch right away.

Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
but the development process works more smoothly than that now.  You should
receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
that you have sent your patches to the right place.  Wait for a minimum of
						     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
busy times like merge windows.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ