linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] interconnect: qcom: constify qcom_icc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <12570c36-d005-f51c-654b-01d52c50205c@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:17:21 +0300
From:   Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] interconnect: qcom: constify qcom_icc_desc

On 22.04.22 18:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/04/2022 12:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> struct qcom_icc_desc is not modified so it can be made const for safety.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8916.c |  6 +++---
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8939.c |  8 ++++----
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/msm8974.c | 12 ++++++------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcm2290.c | 12 ++++++------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/qcs404.c  |  6 +++---
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/sc7180.c  | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/sc7280.c  | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/sdm660.c  | 12 ++++++------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8150.c  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8250.c  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8350.c  | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>   drivers/interconnect/qcom/sm8450.c  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Any comments here?

Thanks for the patches! I had actually some of these changes in my local tree
for a long time. Do you want to send a follow-up patch also for sc8280xp?

BR,
Georgi