linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: nvmem: mediatek: Convert mtk-efuse binding to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51be638b-e12d-b9ae-c14b-f51e33d2503e@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:53:52 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "allen-kh.cheng" <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc:     Lala Lin <lala.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: nvmem: mediatek: Convert mtk-efuse
 binding to YAML

On 27/04/2022 12:00, allen-kh.cheng wrote:
> I think there are two cases in mediatek efuse dirver now.
> 
> Case 1, 
> const: mediatek,efuse is deprecated.
> const: mediatek,mt8173-efuse is remained. All mediatek chipsets will
> use mediatek,mt8173-efuse as fallback.
> 
> Case 2,
> const: mediatek,efuse is deprecated.
> const: mediatek,mt8173-efuse is deprecated.
> 
> All mediatek chipsets(include ediatek,mt8173-efuse) will use
> mediatek,efuse as fallback.
> 
> Which one do you think is better?

Indeed, I forgot that mt8173 would also fallback to generic efuse.
Indeed let's go with case 2, so your proposal before was correct.


Best regards,
Krzysztof