[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220427143410.bectqumq62qmlv5x@houat>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:34:10 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drm: of: Lookup if child node has panel or
bridge"
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 01:40:31PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:24 PM Paul Kocialkowski
> <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu 21 Apr 22, 10:59, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > Hi Maxime,
> > >
> > > On Thu 21 Apr 22, 10:23, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 01:15:54PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > + Linus
> > > > > + Marek
> > > > > + Laurent
> > > > > + Robert
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 4:40 AM Bjorn Andersson
> > > > > <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Commit '80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child node has panel or
> > > > > > bridge")' attempted to simplify the case of expressing a simple panel
> > > > > > under a DSI controller, by assuming that the first non-graph child node
> > > > > > was a panel or bridge.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately for non-trivial cases the first child node might not be a
> > > > > > panel or bridge. Examples of this can be a aux-bus in the case of
> > > > > > DisplayPort, or an opp-table represented before the panel node.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In these cases the reverted commit prevents the caller from ever finding
> > > > > > a reference to the panel.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This reverts commit '80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child node has
> > > > > > panel or bridge")', in favor of using an explicit graph reference to the
> > > > > > panel in the trivial case as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > This eventually breaks many child-based devm_drm_of_get_bridge
> > > > > switched drivers. Do you have any suggestions on how to proceed to
> > > > > succeed in those use cases as well?
> > > >
> > > > I guess we could create a new helper for those, like
> > > > devm_drm_of_get_bridge_with_panel, or something.
> > >
> > > Oh wow I feel stupid for not thinking about that.
> > >
> > > Yeah I agree that it seems like the best option.
> >
> > Should I prepare a patch with such a new helper?
> >
> > The idea would be to keep drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge only for the of graph
> > case and add one for the child node case, maybe:
> > drm_of_find_child_panel_or_bridge.
> >
> > I really don't have a clear idea of which driver would need to be switched
> > over though. Could someone (Jagan?) let me know where it would be needed?
>
> sun6i_mipi_dsi
It doesn't look like sun6i_mipi_dsi is using devm_drm_of_get_bridge at all?
> exynos_drm_dsi
If you reference 711c7adc4687, I don't see why we would need to switch
it back to the old behaviour. It wasn't iterating over its child node
before, so what does the switch to drm_of_get_bridge broke exactly?
> mcde_dsi (as of now)
Yeah, we do need to revert 3730bc6147b0 and 3d7039e1e649
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists