[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFp=p+m2YSYJne=4TyejgYD-6OoARc=NkaFJOpora1r9iA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:42:48 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <quic_c_sbhanu@...cinc.com>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, chris@...ntf.net,
venkatg@...eaurora.org, gdjakov@...sol.com,
quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
quic_rampraka@...cinc.com, quic_pragalla@...cinc.com,
quic_sartgarg@...cinc.com, quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com,
quic_sayalil@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] mmc: sdhci-msm: Reset GCC_SDCC_BCR register for SDHC
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 at 18:02, Shaik Sajida Bhanu
<quic_c_sbhanu@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Reset GCC_SDCC_BCR register before every fresh initilazation. This will
> reset whole SDHC-msm controller, clears the previous power control
> states and avoids, software reset timeout issues as below.
>
> [ 5.458061][ T262] mmc1: Reset 0x1 never completed.
> [ 5.462454][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: ============ SDHCI REGISTER DUMP ===========
> [ 5.469065][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00007202
> [ 5.475688][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Blk size: 0x00000000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000
> [ 5.482315][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
> [ 5.488927][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Present: 0x01f800f0 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
> [ 5.495539][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Power: 0x00000000 | Blk gap: 0x00000000
> [ 5.502162][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000003
> [ 5.508768][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
> [ 5.515381][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
> [ 5.521996][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: ACmd stat: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
> [ 5.528607][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Caps: 0x362dc8b2 | Caps_1: 0x0000808f
> [ 5.535227][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
> [ 5.541841][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Resp[0]: 0x00000000 | Resp[1]: 0x00000000
> [ 5.548454][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Resp[2]: 0x00000000 | Resp[3]: 0x00000000
> [ 5.555079][ T262] mmc1: sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
> [ 5.559651][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: ----------- VENDOR REGISTER DUMP-----------
> [ 5.566621][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: DLL sts: 0x00000000 | DLL cfg: 0x6000642c | DLL cfg2: 0x0020a000
> [ 5.575465][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: DLL cfg3: 0x00000000 | DLL usr ctl: 0x00010800 | DDR cfg: 0x80040873
> [ 5.584658][ T262] mmc1: sdhci_msm: Vndr func: 0x00018a9c | Vndr func2 : 0xf88218a8 Vndr func3: 0x02626040
>
> Fixes: 0eb0d9f4de34 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Initial support for Qualcomm chipsets")
> Signed-off-by: Shaik Sajida Bhanu <quic_c_sbhanu@...cinc.com>
So this looks good to me, but I can't apply it until I get a patch
that updates the DT doc too.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
>
> Changes since V4:
> - Called reset_control_put() in error path.
>
> Changes since V3:
> - Used reset controller local variable as suggested by
> Bjorn Andersson.
> - Passed NULL as a parameter to
> devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() as suggested by
> Bjorn Andersson.
> - Replaced devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() with
> reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() and called
> reset_control_put() before returning to clear the reset
> controller as suggested by Bjorn Andersson.
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Dropped new line after fixes tag as suggested by Bjorn
> Andersson.
> - Passed device structure instead of passing platform_device
> structure as a argument for sdhci_msm_gcc_reset() as suggested
> by Bjorn Andersson.
> - Replaced dev_err() with dev_err_probe() as suggested by Bjorn
> Andersson.
>
> Changes since V1:
> - Added fixes tag as suggested by Ulf Hansson.
> - Replaced devm_reset_control_get() with
> devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive() as suggested by
> Ulf Hansson.
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> index 50c71e0..ff9f5b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/interconnect.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
>
> #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
> #include "cqhci.h"
> @@ -2482,6 +2483,43 @@ static inline void sdhci_msm_get_of_property(struct platform_device *pdev,
> of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,dll-config", &msm_host->dll_config);
> }
>
> +static int sdhci_msm_gcc_reset(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct reset_control *reset;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + reset = reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(reset))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(reset),
> + "unable to acquire core_reset\n");
> +
> + if (!reset)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = reset_control_assert(reset);
> + if (ret) {
> + reset_control_put(reset);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "core_reset assert failed\n");
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The hardware requirement for delay between assert/deassert
> + * is at least 3-4 sleep clock (32.7KHz) cycles, which comes to
> + * ~125us (4/32768). To be on the safe side add 200us delay.
> + */
> + usleep_range(200, 210);
> +
> + ret = reset_control_deassert(reset);
> + if (ret) {
> + reset_control_put(reset);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "core_reset deassert failed\n");
> + }
> +
> + usleep_range(200, 210);
> + reset_control_put(reset);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
>
> static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> @@ -2529,6 +2567,10 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> msm_host->saved_tuning_phase = INVALID_TUNING_PHASE;
>
> + ret = sdhci_msm_gcc_reset(&pdev->dev, host);
> + if (ret)
> + goto pltfm_free;
> +
> /* Setup SDCC bus voter clock. */
> msm_host->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "bus");
> if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk)) {
> --
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists