linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: Add binding for Sercomm parser

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25da3f43-c46e-8108-2da9-0e4f2b7cc1a4@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:24:35 +0300
From:   Mikhail Zhilkin <csharper2005@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     NOGUCHI Hiroshi <drvlabo@...il.com>, Karim <Karimdplay@...il.com>,
        M <x1@...root.org>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: partitions: Add binding for
 Sercomm parser


Hi, Krzysztof,

On 4/10/2022 11:18 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I am sorry, but you changed now a lot in the bindings and it looks
> entirely different. Things previously being correct now are wrong, so
> rather start from your old bindings...


Looks like I'm a bit confused... I use dual "compatible" in my real dts
and I realized that:

1. Therefore I have to use  dual "compatible" in example too:

compatible = "sercomm,sc-partitions", "fixed-partitions";

2. When I'm trying to reuse "fixed-partitions" compatible from
fixed-partitions.yaml in my new .yaml I get "too long" errors.

Real dts:

Link:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/edcc1a9a734bb3fcdc9242025290d3f173e71b78/target/linux/ramips/dts/mt7621_beeline_smartbox-giga.dts#L79

So, I currently found another solution - to extend fixed-partitions.yaml
with "sercomm,sc-partitions". Is It ok from your side? Can I use this
code in v3?

diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/fixed-partitions.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/fixed-partitions.yaml
index ea4cace6a955..9eebe39a57fb 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/fixed-partitions.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/fixed-partitions.yaml
@@ -19,7 +19,11 @@ maintainers:
 
 properties:
   compatible:
-    const: fixed-partitions
+    oneOf:
+      - const: fixed-partitions
+      - items:
+          - const: sercomm,sc-partitions
+          - const: fixed-partitions
 
   "#address-cells": true
 
@@ -27,7 +31,18 @@ properties:
 
 patternProperties:
   "@[0-9a-f]+$":
-    $ref: "partition.yaml#"
+    allOf:
+      - $ref: "partition.yaml#"
+      - if:
+          properties:
+            compatible:
+              contains:
+                const: sercomm,sc-partitions
+        then:
+          properties:
+            scpart-id:
+              description: Partition id in Sercomm partition map
+              $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
 
 required:
   - "#address-cells"
@@ -119,3 +134,29 @@ examples:
             };
         };
     };
+  - |
+    partitions {
+        compatible = "sercomm,sc-partitions", "fixed-partitions";
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <1>;
+
+        partition@0 {
+            label = "u-boot";
+            reg = <0x0 0x100000>;
+            scpart-id=<0>;
+            read-only;
+        };
+
+        partition@...000 {
+            label = "dynamic partition map";
+            reg = <0x100000 0x100000>;
+            scpart-id = <1>;
+        };
+
+        partition@...000 {
+            label = "Factory";
+            reg = <0x200000 0x100000>;
+            scpart-id = <2>;
+            read-only;
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.25.1


>> +
>> +additionalProperties: true
> This is wrong, why it became true?

You're right. Got it


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
Best regards,
Mikhail