linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce In Field Scan driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ymq5nH/A9c88wIM/@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:58:20 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     hdegoede@...hat.com, markgross@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, corbet@....net,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, jithu.joseph@...el.com,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        ravi.v.shankar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce In Field Scan driver

On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:38:39AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> Hopefully this is close enough to done to begin discussion on which
> maintainer tree will take this series.
> 
> Choices:
> 1) Hans/Mark take it into the platform-drivers tree
>    Needs an Ack from x86 maintainers on parts 1 & 2
> 2) X86 maintainers take it into TIP
>    Needs Ack from Hans/Mark on parts 2-10
> 
> TL;DR this driver loads scan test files that can check whether silicon
> in a CPU core is still running correctly. It is expected that these tests
> would be run several times per day to catch problems as silicon ages.

Much nicer and simpler as compared to the first version submitted,
thanks for sticking with it.  The diff seems about 1/3 smaller from the
first version sent out, peer-review works :)

Reviewed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>