[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202204290047.KTxQ2B9w-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:36:00 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [mark:stackleak/rework 9/13] drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:42:16:
error: call to undeclared function 'stackleak_find_top_of_poison'; ISO C99
and later do not support implicit function declarations
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git stackleak/rework
head: eceae38b5363e034fea5ad4cf977734a864a2bb0
commit: 4aac8d85c42a73f2d4dcb11acf3e4ec669919e08 [9/13] lkdtm/stackleak: rework boundary management
config: s390-buildonly-randconfig-r006-20220428 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220429/202204290047.KTxQ2B9w-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c59473aacce38cd7dd77eebceaf3c98c5707ab3b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
# https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/commit/?id=4aac8d85c42a73f2d4dcb11acf3e4ec669919e08
git remote add mark https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git
git fetch --no-tags mark stackleak/rework
git checkout 4aac8d85c42a73f2d4dcb11acf3e4ec669919e08
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/misc/lkdtm/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:17:39: error: call to undeclared function 'stackleak_task_low_bound'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
const unsigned long task_stack_low = stackleak_task_low_bound(current);
^
drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:18:40: error: call to undeclared function 'stackleak_task_high_bound'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
const unsigned long task_stack_high = stackleak_task_high_bound(current);
^
drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:19:22: warning: incompatible pointer to integer conversion initializing 'const unsigned long' with an expression of type 'unsigned long (void)' [-Wint-conversion]
const unsigned long current_sp = current_stack_pointer;
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:20:43: error: no member named 'lowest_stack' in 'struct task_struct'
const unsigned long lowest_sp = current->lowest_stack;
~~~~~~~ ^
>> drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c:42:16: error: call to undeclared function 'stackleak_find_top_of_poison'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
poison_high = stackleak_find_top_of_poison(task_stack_low, untracked_high);
^
1 warning and 4 errors generated.
vim +/stackleak_find_top_of_poison +42 drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c
13
14 void lkdtm_STACKLEAK_ERASING(void)
15 {
16 const unsigned long task_stack_base = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(current);
17 const unsigned long task_stack_low = stackleak_task_low_bound(current);
18 const unsigned long task_stack_high = stackleak_task_high_bound(current);
19 const unsigned long current_sp = current_stack_pointer;
20 const unsigned long lowest_sp = current->lowest_stack;
21 unsigned long untracked_high;
22 unsigned long poison_high, poison_low;
23 bool test_failed = false;
24
25 /*
26 * Depending on what has run prior to this test, the lowest recorded
27 * stack pointer could be above or below the current stack pointer.
28 * Start from the lowest of the two.
29 *
30 * Poison values are naturally-aligned unsigned longs. As the current
31 * stack pointer might not be sufficiently aligned, we must align
32 * downwards to find the lowest known stack pointer value. This is the
33 * high boundary for a portion of the stack which may have been used
34 * without being tracked, and has to be scanned for poison.
35 */
36 untracked_high = min(current_sp, lowest_sp);
37 untracked_high = ALIGN_DOWN(untracked_high, sizeof(unsigned long));
38
39 /*
40 * Find the top of the poison in the same way as the erasing code.
41 */
> 42 poison_high = stackleak_find_top_of_poison(task_stack_low, untracked_high);
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists