[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220428201947.GA1912192@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 13:19:47 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
Cc: "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 23/70] mm/mmap: change do_brk_flags() to expand
existing VMA and add do_brk_munmap()
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:06:35PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote:
> From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
>
> Avoid allocating a new VMA when it a vma modification can occur. When a
> brk() can expand or contract a VMA, then the single store operation will
> only modify one index of the maple tree instead of causing a node to split
> or coalesce. This avoids unnecessary allocations/frees of maple tree
> nodes and VMAs.
>
> Move some limit & flag verifications out of the do_brk_flags() function to
> use only relevant checks in the code path of bkr() and vm_brk_flags().
>
> Set the vma to check if it can expand in vm_brk_flags() if extra criteria
> are met.
>
> Drop userfaultfd from do_brk_flags() path and only use it in
> vm_brk_flags() path since that is the only place a munmap will happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
A build failure seen when building ppc64:corenet64_smp_defconfig also
biscects to this patch.
mm/mmap.c: In function 'do_brk_flags':
mm/mmap.c:2908:17: error: implicit declaration of function
'khugepaged_enter_vma_merge'; did you mean 'khugepaged_enter_vma'?
It appears that this is later fixed, but it hurts bisectability
(and prevents me from finding the actual build failure in linux-next
when trying to build corenet64_smp_defconfig).
While looking into the patch, I noticed the following.
[ ... ]
> @@ -2773,30 +2888,52 @@ static int do_brk_flags(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (security_vm_enough_memory_mm(mm, len >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> out:
> perf_event_mmap(vma);
> mm->total_vm += len >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -2807,18 +2944,21 @@ static int do_brk_flags(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> validate_mm_mt(mm);
> return 0;
>
> -no_vma_link:
> vm_area_free(vma);
That really looks wrong. vm_area_free(vma) can not be reached
after this patch has been applied.
Guenter
> +vma_alloc_fail:
> + vm_unacct_memory(len >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists