linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: zynq: Add all the supported compatibles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1651177993.343093.220467.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:33:13 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        git@...inx.com, brgl@...ev.pl, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: gpio: zynq: Add all the supported compatibles

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:06:38 +0530, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
> From: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
> 
> Add the compatibles for zynqmp, versal and platform management controller
> nodes.
> 
> Fixes: 45ca16072b70 ("dt-bindings: gpio: zynq: convert bindings to YAML")
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>
> ---
> NOTE- There is 'gpio@...0a000: interrupts: [[0], [20], [4]] is too long'
> warning coming with upstream yaml. I am checking it on devicetree mailing
> list. https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg493762.html
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-zynq.yaml | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the
following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is
incorrect. These may not be new warnings.

Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check.
This will change in the future.

Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/


gpio@...a0000: '#address-cells', 'gpio-line-names', 'power-domains' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/avnet-ultra96-rev1.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-sm-k26-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-smk-k26-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dtb

gpio@...a0000: '#address-cells', 'power-domains' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1232-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1254-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1275-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm015-dc1.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm016-dc2.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm017-dc3.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm018-dc4.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zc1751-xm019-dc5.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-rev1.0.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-rev1.1.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu102-revB.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu104-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu104-revC.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu106-revA.dtb
	arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu111-revA.dtb