[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220428040556.GA3945421@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 04:05:57 +0000
From: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
CC: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] mm, memory_hotplug: fix inconsistent
num_poisoned_pages on memory hotremove
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:20:16AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/4/27 12:28, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> >
> > When offlining memory section with hwpoisoned pages, the hwpoisons are
> > canceled. But num_poisoned_pages is not updated for that event, so the
> > counter becomes inconsistent.
>
> IIUC, this work is already done via clear_hwpoisoned_pages when __remove_pages.
> Or am I miss something?
Actually I had the same question when writing this patch, and found that
__remove_pages() seems to be called from device memory or HMM, but not from
offline_pages(). If you mean that we could make offline_pages() call
clear_hwpoisoned_pages(), that seems possible and I'll consider it.
But as David and Oscar pointed out for 0/4, removing PageHWPoison flags
in offlining seems not to be right thing, so I'd like to have some consensus
on what way to go first.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists