[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATJHfGDKfp0q_VH30xKXdsFmveRZ6CNqZpHdjM3UbYG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 13:38:39 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/27] kbuild: do not create *.prelink.o for Clang LTO or IBT
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:31 PM Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu> wrote:
>
> On Mon 25 Apr 2022 04:08:11 GMT Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > When CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=y, additional intermediate *.prelink.o is
> > created
> > for each module. Also, objtool is postponed until LLVM bitcode is
> > converted to ELF.
> >
> > CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT works in a similar way to postpone objtool until
> > objects are merged together.
> >
> > This commit stops generating *.prelink.o, so the build flow will look
> > the same with/without LTO.
> >
> > The following figures show how the LTO build currently works, and
> > how this commit is changing it.
> >
> > Current build flow
> > ==================
> >
> > [1] single-object module
> >
> > [+objtool]
> > $(CC) $(LD) $(LD)
> > foo.c --------------------> foo.o -----> foo.prelink.o -----> foo.ko
> > (LLVM bitcode) (ELF) |
> > |
> > foo.mod.o --/
> >
> > [2] multi-object module
> > [+objtool]
> > $(CC) $(AR) $(LD) $(LD)
> > foo1.c -----> foo1.o -----> foo.o -----> foo.prelink.o -----> foo.ko
> > | (archive) (ELF) |
> > foo2.c -----> foo2.o --/ |
> > (LLVM bitcode) foo.mod.o --/
> >
> > One confusion is foo.o in multi-object module is an archive despite of
> > its suffix.
> >
> > New build flow
> > ==============
> >
> > [1] single-object module
> >
> > Since there is only one object, we do not need to have the LLVM
> > bitcode stage. Use $(CC)+$(LD) to generate an ELF object in one
> > build rule. Of course, only $(CC) is used when LTO is disabled.
> >
> > $(CC)+$(LD)[+objtool] $(LD)
> > foo.c ------------------------> foo.o -------> foo.ko
> > (ELF) |
> > |
> > foo.mod.o --/
> >
> > [2] multi-object module
> >
> > Previously, $(AR) was used to combine LLVM bitcode into an archive,
> > but there was not a technical reason to do so.
> > This commit just uses $(LD) to combine and convert them into a single
> > ELF object.
> >
> > [+objtool]
> > $(CC) $(LD) $(LD)
> > foo1.c -------> foo1.o -------> foo.o -------> foo.ko
> > | (ELF) |
> > foo2.c -------> foo2.o ---/ |
> > (LLVM bitcode) foo.mod.o --/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >
> > scripts/Kbuild.include | 4 +++
> > scripts/Makefile.build | 58 ++++++++++++---------------------------
> > scripts/Makefile.lib | 7 -----
> > scripts/Makefile.modfinal | 5 ++--
> > scripts/Makefile.modpost | 9 ++----
> > scripts/mod/modpost.c | 7 -----
> > 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/Kbuild.include b/scripts/Kbuild.include
> > index 3514c2149e9d..455a0a6ce12d 100644
> > --- a/scripts/Kbuild.include
> > +++ b/scripts/Kbuild.include
> > @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ pound := \#
> > # Name of target with a '.' as filename prefix. foo/bar.o => foo/.bar.o
> > dot-target = $(dir $@).$(notdir $@)
> >
> > +###
> > +# Name of target with a '.tmp_' as filename prefix. foo/bar.o => foo/.tmp_bar.o
> > +tmp-target = $(dir $@).tmp_$(notdir $@)
>
> This matches the dot-target definition above, otherwise $(@D).tmp_$(@F)
> would be an alternative.
Yes, I intentionally made dot-target and tmp-target look similar.
The difference is $(dir ...) leaves the trailing slash, but $(@D) does not.
The alternative would be
$(@D)/.tmp_$(@F)
>
> > +
> > ###
> > # The temporary file to save gcc -MMD generated dependencies must not
> > # contain a comma
> > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
> > index 7f199b0a5170..fe4d3a908dd0 100644
> > --- a/scripts/Makefile.build
> > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
> > @@ -88,10 +88,6 @@ endif
> > targets-for-modules := $(foreach x, o mod $(if $(CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS), usyms), \
> > $(patsubst %.o, %.$x, $(filter %.o, $(obj-m))))
> >
> > -ifneq ($(CONFIG_LTO_CLANG)$(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT),)
> > -targets-for-modules += $(patsubst %.o, %.prelink.o, $(filter %.o, $(obj-m)))
> > -endif
> > -
> > ifdef need-modorder
> > targets-for-modules += $(obj)/modules.order
> > endif
> > @@ -153,8 +149,16 @@ $(obj)/%.ll: $(src)/%.c FORCE
> > # The C file is compiled and updated dependency information is generated.
> > # (See cmd_cc_o_c + relevant part of rule_cc_o_c)
> >
> > +is-single-obj-m = $(if $(part-of-module),$(if $(filter $@, $(obj-m)),y))
>
> Perhaps using $(and ..,..,y) instead if $(if ..,$(if ..,y))?
Good idea!
I did not notice this. I will do it in v2.
> >
> > -endif
> > +delay-objtool := $(or $(CONFIG_LTO_CLANG),$(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT))
> > +
> > +$(obj)/%.o: objtool-enabled = $(if $(is-standard-object),$(if $(delay-objtool),$(is-single-obj-m),y))
>
> same here? $(and) versus $(if ..,$(if ..,y))
I am not sure about this case.
The second if-func is $(if cond, A, B) form.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists