lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:20:28 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: mediatek: add mt6358 and mt6366
 compatible

On 28/04/2022 08:46, Allen-KH Cheng wrote:
> Add mt6358 and mt6366 compatible in devicetree-binding document for
> MediaTek PMIC based RTC. mt6358 and mt6366 use same compatible data
> to store RTC_WRTGR address offset.
> 
> mt6366-rtc will use mt6358-rts as fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-mt6397.txt | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-mt6397.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-mt6397.txt
> index 55a0c8874c03..5b012d222f5b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-mt6397.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-mt6397.txt
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ For MediaTek PMIC wrapper bus bindings, see:
>  Required properties:
>  - compatible: Should be one of follows
>         "mediatek,mt6323-rtc": for MT6323 PMIC
> +       "mediatek,mt6358-rtc": for MT6358 PMIC
> +       "mediatek,mt6358-rtc","mediatek,mt6366-rtc": for MT6366 PMIC

Does not look like in correct order.

>         "mediatek,mt6397-rtc": for MT6397 PMIC
>  
>  Example:


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ