[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1651130723-23635-3-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:25:23 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] bpf, docs: BPF_FROM_BE exists as alias for BPF_TO_BE
According include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:
#define BPF_FROM_LE BPF_TO_LE
#define BPF_FROM_BE BPF_TO_BE
BPF_FROM_BE exists as alias for BPF_TO_BE instead of BPF_TO_LE.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
---
Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
index 30b019c..00b0800 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/instruction-set.rst
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ Examples:
dst_reg = htobe64(dst_reg)
``BPF_FROM_LE`` and ``BPF_FROM_BE`` exist as aliases for ``BPF_TO_LE`` and
-``BPF_TO_LE`` respetively.
+``BPF_TO_BE`` respetively.
Jump instructions
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists