[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdc76135-f143-310e-6b54-6ce41b19f7e1@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:59:37 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
To: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: amphion: ensure the buffer count is not
less than min_buffer
On 27/04/2022 11:31, Ming Qian wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 3:25 PM
>> To: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>; mchehab@...nel.org;
>> shawnguo@...nel.org
>> Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de;
>> festevam@...il.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; Aisheng Dong
>> <aisheng.dong@....com>; linux-media@...r.kernel.org;
>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: amphion: ensure the buffer count is not
>> less than min_buffer
>>
>> Caution: EXT Email
>>
>> On 27/04/2022 09:01, Ming Qian wrote:
>>>> From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 2:38 PM
>>>> To: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>; mchehab@...nel.org;
>>>> shawnguo@...nel.org
>>>> Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org; s.hauer@...gutronix.de;
>>>> kernel@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com; dl-linux-imx
>>>> <linux-imx@....com>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>;
>>>> linux-media@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>>>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: amphion: ensure the buffer count is
>>>> not less than min_buffer
>>>>
>>>> Caution: EXT Email
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ming Qian,
>>>>
>>>> On 22/03/2022 09:28, Ming Qian wrote:
>>>>> the output buffer count should >= min_buffer_out the capture buffer
>>>>> count should >= min_buffer_cap
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c | 4 ++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
>>>>> b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
>>>>> index cbf3315605a9..72a0544f4da3 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_v4l2.c
>>>>> @@ -355,6 +355,10 @@ static int vpu_vb2_queue_setup(struct
>> vb2_queue
>>>> *vq,
>>>>> return 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_OUTPUT(vq->type))
>>>>> + *buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count,
>>>> inst->min_buffer_out);
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + *buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count,
>>>>> + inst->min_buffer_cap);
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that min_buffer_out/cap is set to 2, but min_buffers_needed
>>>> is set to 1. Wouldn't it make more sense to set min_buffers_needed to
>>>> 2 as well?
>>>>
>>>> If you do that, then the vb2 core will already take care of ensuring
>>>> that the buf_count is adjusted.
>>>>
>>>> If you *do* have to do this manually, then you need to place the
>>>> whole if-else under 'if (!*num_planes) {', otherwise it will mess up
>>>> the VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS ioctl. See the queue_setup in
>>>> include/media/videobuf2-core.h documentation for the sordid details.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>> I want to make the vpu start when 1 frames is queued, so I set the
>> min_buffers_needed to 1.
>>> And the min_buffer_cap may be changed when a source change event is
>> triggered. So in most case, it will be larger than 2.
>>
>> Ah, I only grepped for min_buffer_out, not _cap, so I missed that that one isn't
>> constant.
>>
>>> I'll make a v2 patch that place the whole if-else under 'if (!*num_planes)
>> {'
>>
> Hi Hans,
> I send a v2 patch.
> But I think the v1 is OK, as the full code has already guaranteed the condition ` if (!*num_planes)`,
>
> if (*plane_count) {
> ... ...
> return 0;
> }
> if (V4L2_TYPE_IS_OUTPUT(vq->type))
> *buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count, inst->min_buffer_out);
> else
> *buf_count = max_t(unsigned int, *buf_count, inst->min_buffer_cap);
>
You are correct, it wasn't visible in the patch that the *buf_count adjustments
only happened if *plane_count == 0.
I'm going back to v1.
Sorry for the confusion!
Hans
> Ming
>
>> Great, thank you!
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>> Thanks for your reminder
>>>
>>> Ming
>>>
>>>>> *plane_count = cur_fmt->num_planes;
>>>>> for (i = 0; i < cur_fmt->num_planes; i++)
>>>>> psize[i] = cur_fmt->sizeimage[i];
>>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists