linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 0/4] PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220428080718.3094464-1-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 10:07:14 +0200
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4]  PCI: Rework pci_scan_slot() and isolated PCI functions

Hi Bjorn, Hi Jan,

In an earlier version[0], I sought to apply the existing jailhouse special case
for isolated PCI functions to s390. As Bjorn noted in[1] there appears to be
some potential for cleaning things up and removing duplication though.

This series attempts to do this cleanup (Patches 1 and 2) followed by enabling
isolated PCI functions for s390 (Patches 3 and 4). If need be I can of course
split the cleanup off but for now I kept it as one as that's what I have
been testing.

Testing:
- On s390 with SR-IOV and a ConnectX NIC with PF 1 but not PF 0 passed throug
  i.e. the isolated function case. Also of course with just VFs and an NVMe.
- On x86_64 on a desktop system where ARI is disabled and with an SR-IOV NIC
  with non-contiguous VFs as well as the usual other PCI devices.

Thanks,
Niklas

Changes v4 -> v5:
- Remove unintended whitespace change in patch 1
Changes v3 -> v4:
- Use a do {} while loop in pci_scan_slot() as it is simpler (Bjorn)
- Explicitly check "fn == 0" as it is not a pointer or bool (Bjorn)
- Keep the "!dev" check in the ARI branch of next_fn() (Bjorn)
- Moved the "fn == 0 && !dev" condition out of next_fn() into pci_scan_slot().
  This allows us to keep the "!dev" case in the ARI branch and means there are
  no new conditions in next_fn() making it easier to verify that its behavior
  is equivalent to the existing code.
- Guard the assignment of dev->multifunction with "fn > 0"
  instead of "nr > 0". This matches the existing logic more closely and works
  for the jailhouse case which unconditionally sets dev->multifunction for
  "fn > 0". This also means fn == 0 is the single "first iteration" test.
- Remove some unneeded whitespace in patch 2

Changes v2 -> v3:
- Removed now unused nr_devs variable (kernel test robot)

Niklas Schnelle (4):
  PCI: Clean up pci_scan_slot()
  PCI: Move jailhouse's isolated function handling to pci_scan_slot()
  PCI: Extend isolated function probing to s390
  s390/pci: allow zPCI zbus without a function zero

 arch/s390/pci/pci_bus.c    | 82 ++++++++++----------------------------
 drivers/pci/probe.c        | 64 +++++++++++++----------------
 include/linux/hypervisor.h |  8 ++++
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)

-- 
2.32.0