[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220428110817.07ce92a6@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:08:17 +0200
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Clement Leger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] dt-bindings: PCI: renesas,pci-rcar-gen2: Add
device tree support for r9a06g032
Hi Geert,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:15:15 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Hervé,
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:09 PM Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > Add internal PCI bridge support for the r9a06g032 SOC. The Renesas
> > RZ/N1D (R9A06G032) internal PCI bridge is compatible with the one
> > present in the R-Car Gen2 family.
> > Compared to the R-Car Gen2 family, it needs three clocks instead of
> > one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/renesas,pci-rcar-gen2.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/renesas,pci-rcar-gen2.yaml
> > @@ -113,6 +113,37 @@ required:
> > - "#size-cells"
> > - "#interrupt-cells"
> >
> > +if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + enum:
> > + - renesas,pci-rzn1
> > +
> > +then:
> > + properties:
> > + clocks:
> > + items:
> > + - description: Internal bus clock (AHB) for HOST
> > + - description: Internal bus clock (AHB) Power Management
> > + - description: PCI clock for USB subsystem
> > + clock-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: hclk_usbh
> > + - const: hclk_usbpm
> > + - const: clk_pci_usb
>
> These are the provider names.
> I think they should use the consumer names: usb_hclkh, usb_hclkpm,
> and usb_pciclk.
Yes, it makes sense.
I will changed in v4.
>
> The rest looks good to me.
Perfect.
Thanks for the review,
Hervé
--
Hervé Codina, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists