[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220428104612.GA14515@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:46:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: Cleanup ioremap() and support ioremap_prot()
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Let's arm64 use GENERIC_IOREMAP to cleanup code, and
> support ioremap_prot()/HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT, which could
> enable generic_access_phys().
>
> Kefeng Wang (4):
> mm: ioremap: Setup phys_addr of struct vm_struct
> mm: ioremap: Add arch_ioremap/iounmap_check()
> arm64: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP
> arm64: Add HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT support
>
> .../features/vm/ioremap_prot/arch-support.txt | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h | 14 +--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 10 +++
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 10 ---
> arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c | 86 +++----------------
> include/asm-generic/io.h | 3 +
> mm/ioremap.c | 21 ++++-
> 9 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
That's not a massively compelling diffstat for a cleanup, in all honesty.
I looked at generic_access_phys() to try to figure out why we would want
that on arm64, but it seems like it's related to mmap() of devices in
userspace. Bearing in mind that CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM=y by default, please
can you justify why this is something worth doing?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists