[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220428111907.3635820-4-yukuai3@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 19:19:07 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: <jack@...e.cz>, <tj@...nel.org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<paolo.valente@...aro.org>
CC: <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v4 3/3] block, bfq: do not idle if only one group is activated
Now that root group is counted into 'num_groups_with_busy_queues',
'num_groups_with_busy_queues > 0' is always true in
bfq_asymmetric_scenario(). Thus change the condition to '> 1'.
On the other hand, this change can enable concurrent sync io if only
one group is activated.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 609b4e894684..aeba9001da0b 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static bool bfq_asymmetric_scenario(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
return varied_queue_weights || multiple_classes_busy
#ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
- || bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues > 0
+ || bfqd->num_groups_with_busy_queues > 1
#endif
;
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists