[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220428124001.7428-3-w@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:39:56 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Moshe Kol <moshe.kol@...l.huji.ac.il>,
Yossi Gilad <yossi.gilad@...l.huji.ac.il>,
Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net 2/7] tcp: use different parts of the port_offset for index and offset
Amit Klein suggests that we use different parts of port_offset for the
table's index and the port offset so that there is no direct relation
between them.
Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Moshe Kol <moshe.kol@...l.huji.ac.il>
Cc: Yossi Gilad <yossi.gilad@...l.huji.ac.il>
Cc: Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index 9d24d9319f3d..29c701cd8312 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ int __inet_hash_connect(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row,
net_get_random_once(table_perturb, sizeof(table_perturb));
index = hash_32(port_offset, INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SHIFT);
- offset = READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + port_offset;
+ offset = READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + (port_offset >> 32);
offset %= remaining;
/* In first pass we try ports of @low parity.
--
2.17.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists