[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOtMz3OeLzvtJ_T6w9v-OYCbTTxpfQjLsajN-a439QuETod7hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:42:11 +0200
From: Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>,
"Easow, Nimesh" <Nimesh.Easow@....com>, upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Modify timing parameters for amdpsp mailbox
czw., 28 kwi 2022 o 15:07 Jarkko Nikula
<jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com> napisał(a):
>
> On 4/28/22 15:26, Jan Dabros wrote:
> > Adjust retry period and timeout values for x86-PSP mailbox based on the
> > typical I2C traffic generated by PSP. In order to limit the possibility
> > of timeouts, x86 should reduce the interval between retries as well as
> > increase overall time after which it gives up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> > index 9b37f2b95abc..b624356c945f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> > @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
> > #define PSP_CMD_TIMEOUT_US (500 * USEC_PER_MSEC)
> >
> > #define PSP_I2C_REQ_BUS_CMD 0x64
> > -#define PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_CNT 10
> > -#define PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_DELAY_US (50 * USEC_PER_MSEC)
> > +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_CNT 400
> > +#define PSP_I2C_REQ_RETRY_DELAY_US (25 * USEC_PER_MSEC)
> > #define PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_OK 0x0
> > #define PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_BUS_BUSY 0x1
> > #define PSP_I2C_REQ_STS_INV_PARAM 0x3
>
> Out of curiosity, can it be up to 400 * 25 ms = 10 s?
Right, worst case x86 is trying to take arbitration of the bus for
10s. But this is very unlikely (margin of safety).
> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists