linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix incorrect TRUNNER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220428140130.2011452-1-ytcoode@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:01:30 +0800
From:   Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
To:     andrii.nakryiko@...il.com
Cc:     andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, kafai@...com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        ytcoode@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Fix incorrect TRUNNER_BINARY name output

Hi Andrii,

I didn't run into any real problems, the purpose of this patch was to make
the output more consistent with expectations.

It confused me when I ran 'make test_progs' but saw [test_maps] output, I
even doubted whether I ran the correct command at first.

But as you said, it's not a big deal, I'm okay with keeping it as it is.

Thanks,
Yuntao