[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ymv4hO9ls7XZGlki@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:39:00 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 04:24:04PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Sergey!
>
> On 4/27/22 20:46, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> > Using IRQ0 by the platform devices is going to be disallowed soon (see [1])
> > and even now, when IRQ0 is about to be returned by platfrom_get_irq(), you
> > see a big warning. The code supporting SH3/4 SoCs maps the IRQ #s starting
> > at 0 -- modify that code to start the IRQ #s from 16 instead.
> >
> > The patch should mostly affect the AP-SH4A-3A/AP-SH4AD-0A boards as they
> > indeed use IRQ0 for the SMSC911x compatible Ethernet chip...
>
> Maybe try getting it landed through Andrew Morton's tree?
I can take it if needed, why does sh patches go through Andrew's tree?
Is there no sh maintainer tree anymore?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists