[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b81cf509-60d5-a733-0b06-374d9c146559@igalia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:44:43 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com, pmladek@...e.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
x86@...nel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net,
halves@...onical.com, fabiomirmar@...il.com,
alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de, corbet@....net,
d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
dyoung@...hat.com, feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/30] tracing: Improve panic/die notifiers
On 29/04/2022 10:56, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [...]
> No. The fallthrough keyword is only needed when there's code between case
> labels. As it is very common to list multiple cases for the same code path.
> That is:
>
> case DIE_OOPS:
> case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
> do_dump = 1;
> break;
>
> Does not need a fall through label, as there's no code between the DIE_OOPS
> and the PANIC_NOTIFIER. But if you had:
>
> case DIE_OOPS:
> x = true;
> case PANIC_NOTIFIER:
> do_dump = 1;
> break;
>
> Then you do.
>
> -- Steve
Thanks a bunch for the clarification, changed that for V2 =)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists