linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 27/37] scsi: add HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6c4e9881dc90d9d7d91b1970a05e58a3d9cc5e4e.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:46:57 +0200
From:   Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
        Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
        Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>,
        Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
        "supporter:QLOGIC QLA2XXX FC-SCSI DRIVER" 
        <GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com>,
        "open list:SCSI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEGARAID SCSI/SAS DRIVERS" 
        <megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 27/37] scsi: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> those drivers using them.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---

Sorry everyone. I sent this as PATCH in error while preparing to sent
the same series as RFC. Since e-mail has no remote delete and I lack a
time machine let's just all pretend you only got the RFC.