[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c557350bdcb1fc2bf73aa30dd631d198f41a5071.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:20 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/37] usb: handle HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 15:51 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to guard sections of code calling them
> as alternative access methods with CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT checks. Similarly
> drivers requiring these functions need to depend on HAS_IOPORT.
>
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
Sorry everyone. I sent this as PATCH in error while preparing to sent
the same series as RFC. Since e-mail has no remote delete and I lack a
time machine let's just all pretend you only got the RFC.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists