lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:30:50 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Moshe Kol <moshe.kol@...l.huji.ac.il>,
        Yossi Gilad <yossi.gilad@...l.huji.ac.il>,
        Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 3/7] tcp: resalt the secret every 10 seconds

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 04:48:52PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 2:40 PM Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> > @@ -101,10 +103,12 @@ u64 secure_ipv6_port_ephemeral(const __be32 *saddr, const __be32 *daddr,
> >                 struct in6_addr saddr;
> >                 struct in6_addr daddr;
> >                 __be16 dport;
> > +               unsigned int timeseed;
> 
> Also, does the struct packing (or lack thereof) lead to problems here?
> Uninitialized bytes might not make a stable hash.

Hmmm, I didn't notice, and I think you're right indeed. I did test in IPv6
without noticing any problem but it doesn't mean that the hash is perfectly
stable.

I'll send an update for this one, thank you!
Willy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ