[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7518924e-5bb4-e6e9-0e3e-3f5cb03bf946@igalia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:04:01 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
bhe@...hat.com, pmladek@...e.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net, halves@...onical.com,
fabiomirmar@...il.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@...cle.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de,
corbet@....net, d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
feng.tang@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mikelley@...rosoft.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com,
jgross@...e.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
luto@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, vgoyal@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/30] panic: Refactor the panic path
On 27/04/2022 21:28, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/22 15:49, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
>> + crash_kexec_post_notifiers
>> + This was DEPRECATED - users should always prefer the
>
> This is DEPRECATED - users should always prefer the
>
>> + parameter "panic_notifiers_level" - check its entry
>> + in this documentation for details on how it works.
>> + Setting this parameter is exactly the same as setting
>> + "panic_notifiers_level=4".
>
Thanks Randy, for your suggestion - but I confess I couldn't understand
it properly. It's related to spaces/tabs, right? What you suggest me to
change in this formatting? Just by looking the email I can't parse.
Cheers,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists