linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Compile stacktrace.nvhe.o

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC_TJvfm0ndtQSPt-gqYmzA-Q51MY6Eu1Gk3MxvCm+VqgtvCOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:25:46 -0700
From:   Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Keir Fraser <keirf@...gle.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        "moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        kvmarm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Compile stacktrace.nvhe.o

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 5:47 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 11:46:56AM -0700, Kalesh Singh wrote:
>
> > Recompile stack unwinding code for use with the nVHE hypervisor. This is
> > a preparatory patch that will allow reusing most of the kernel unwinding
> > logic in the nVHE hypervisor.
>
> This is substantially more than just the build change that the changelog
> would seem to indicate...  it would I think be clearer to split this up
> further with the code changes separated out and explained a bit more.
> It's not just recompling the code for nVHE, there's also refactoring to
> split out changes that don't apply in nVHE hypervisor like all the task
> related code which is needed but not mentioned in the changlog at all.
> Possibly a patch or two for the code motion then a separate patch for
> the ifdefs and build changes?

Hi Mark,

Thank you for reviewing. I agree - will split this into more
incremental patches in the next version.

Thanks,
Kalesh

>
> I *think* the code is all fine but I'd need to go through it a few more
> times to be sure I didn't miss anything.