linux-kernel - Re: [RFC bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add attach bench test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220428203152.41693bbe@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:31:52 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add attach bench test

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:09:45 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> OK, I think I see the issue you have. Because the functions shown in
> available_filter_functions which uses the simple "%ps" to show the function
> name:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/ftrace.c#n3692
> 
> And the code that does the actual matching uses kallsyms_lookup()
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/ftrace.c#n4017
> 
> Which appears not to match the function for the address, you can't pass in
> __bpf_tramp_exit because it wont match the symbol returned by
> kallsyms_lookup.

Never mind, in testing this I had marked the weak function as notrace,
which was the reason I couldn't add it to the set_ftrace_notrace.

After removing the notrace, kallsyms_lookup() doesn't make a difference. It
appears that kallsyms will include overridden weak functions into the size
of the function before it. I tried:

	ret = kallsyms_lookup(rec->ip, &size, &offset, &modname, str);
	if (!ret || offset > size) {
		seq_printf(m, "no function at %lx", rec->ip);
	} else {
		seq_printf(m, "%s", str);
		if (modname)
			seq_printf(m, " [%s]", modname);
	}

And it made no difference.

> 
> This does indeed look like a bug in %ps.
> 

Yes, this does appear to be a issue with kallsyms in general.

-- Steve