[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b554e22-6766-8299-287c-c40240c08536@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:09:06 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
mlevitsk@...hat.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested
events
On 4/29/22 19:03, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This doesn't even compile...
>
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c: In function ‘vmx_has_nested_events’:
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:3862:61: error: ‘vmx’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> 3862 | return nested_vmx_preemption_timer_pending(vcpu) || vmx->nested.mtf_pending;
> | ^~~
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:3862:61: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm_onhyperv.o
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c:3863:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
> 3863 | }
> | ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> LD [M] arch/x86/kvm/kvm.o
Yeah, it doesn't. Of course this will need a v2, also because there are
failures in the vmx tests.
What can I say, testing these patches on AMD hardware wasn't a great idea.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists