[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d53df9d3-5de2-c1e6-11ce-a3b61e9e630e@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:32:40 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: SEV: Mark nested locking of vcpu->lock
On 4/29/22 19:27, Peter Gonda wrote:
> Ah yes I missed that. I would suggest `role = SEV_NR_MIGRATION_ROLES`
> or something else instead of role++ to avoid leaking this
> implementation detail outside of the function signature / enum.
Sure.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists