[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmxzYAdzom0XOTwa@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 01:23:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/21] static_call: Use cfi_unchecked
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 01:36:38PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> With CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL, static calls are patched into direct
> calls. Disable indirect call CFI checking for the call sites with the
> cfi_unchecked macro.
-ENOPARSE
There are no indirect calls.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists