| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <59dd98ad-f12e-b44c-bcb7-e0fabed4b882@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:19:54 +0800
From: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"like.xu.linux@...il.com" <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/16] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL for
guest Arch LBR
On 4/29/2022 11:20 AM, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>
> On 4/28/2022 10:16 PM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>
>> On 4/22/2022 3:55 AM, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>>> From: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Arch LBR is enabled by setting MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL.LBREn to 1. A new guest
>>> state field named "Guest IA32_LBR_CTL" is added to enhance guest LBR
>>> usage.
>>> When guest Arch LBR is enabled, a guest LBR event will be created
>>> like the
>>> model-specific LBR does. Clear guest LBR enable bit on host PMI
>>> handling so
>>> guest can see expected config.
>>>
>>> On processors that support Arch LBR, MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR[bit 0] has no
>>> meaning. It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always return 0.
>>> Like IA32_DEBUGCTL, IA32_ARCH_LBR_CTL msr is also preserved on INIT.
>>>
>>> Regardless of the Arch LBR or legacy LBR, when the LBR_EN bit 0 of the
>>> corresponding control MSR is set to 1, LBR recording will be enabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Co-developed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 2 --
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
>>> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 2 ++
>>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 58
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 12 +++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>>> index 4529ce448b2e..4fe6c3b50fc3 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
>>> @@ -160,8 +160,6 @@ enum {
>>> ARCH_LBR_RETURN |\
>>> ARCH_LBR_OTHER_BRANCH)
>>> -#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK 0x7f000e
>>> -
>>> static void intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
>>> static __always_inline bool is_lbr_call_stack_bit_set(u64 config)
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>>> index 0eb90d21049e..60e0ab108dc0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
>>> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@
>>> #define LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE (0xfull << LBR_INFO_BR_TYPE_OFFSET)
>>> #define MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL 0x000014ce
>>> +#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK 0x7f000e
>>> #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN BIT(0)
>>> #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL_OFFSET 1
>>> #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL (0x3ull << ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL_OFFSET)
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>>> index 0ffaa3156a4e..ea3be961cc8e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>>> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ enum vmcs_field {
>>> GUEST_BNDCFGS_HIGH = 0x00002813,
>>> GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL = 0x00002814,
>>> GUEST_IA32_RTIT_CTL_HIGH = 0x00002815,
>>> + GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL = 0x00002816,
>>> + GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL_HIGH = 0x00002817,
>>> HOST_IA32_PAT = 0x00002c00,
>>> HOST_IA32_PAT_HIGH = 0x00002c01,
>>> HOST_IA32_EFER = 0x00002c02,
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>>> b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>>> index c8e6c1e1e00c..7dc8a5783df7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>>> #include "pmu.h"
>>> #define MSR_PMC_FULL_WIDTH_BIT (MSR_IA32_PMC0 -
>>> MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)
>>> +#define KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK (ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK |
>>> ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN)
>>> static struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping intel_arch_events[] = {
>>> [0] = { 0x3c, 0x00, PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES },
>>> @@ -215,6 +216,7 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu, u32 msr)
>>> ret = pmu->version > 1;
>>> break;
>>> case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
>>> + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>>> if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>> ret = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR);
>>> break;
>>> @@ -361,6 +363,35 @@ static bool arch_lbr_depth_is_valid(struct
>>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 depth)
>>> return (depth == pmu->kvm_arch_lbr_depth);
>>> }
>>> +#define ARCH_LBR_CTL_BRN_MASK GENMASK_ULL(22, 16)
>>> +
>>> +static bool arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 ctl)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry;
>>> +
>>> + if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + if (ctl & ~KVM_ARCH_LBR_CTL_MASK)
>>> + goto warn;
>>> +
>>> + entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1c, 0);
>>> + if (!entry)
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(0)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_CPL))
>>> + return false;
>>> + if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(2)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_STACK))
>>> + return false;
>>> + if (!(entry->ebx & BIT(1)) && (ctl & ARCH_LBR_CTL_BRN_MASK))
>> Why KVM wants to define this mask by itself? Cannot we use the
>> ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER?
>
> Thanks Ken for review!
Please ignore below reply, I must be blind at the moment :-), will use
the existing mask.
>
> Sounds like the ISE has been updated, per section "CPUID for Ach LBRs":
>
> EBX 1 Branch Filtering Supported If set, the processor supports
> setting IA32_LBR_CTL[22:16] to non-zero value.
>
> but the FILTER definition looks like:
>
> #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER_OFFSET 16
>
> #define ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER (0x7full <<
> ARCH_LBR_CTL_FILTER_OFFSET)
>
> Maybe I need to update the FILTER and re-use it.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kan
>>
>>> + return false;
>>> + return true;
>>> +warn:
>>> + pr_warn_ratelimited("kvm: vcpu-%d: invalid arch lbr ctl.\n",
>>> + vcpu->vcpu_id);
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
>>> msr_data *msr_info)
>>> {
>>> struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
>>> @@ -384,6 +415,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>> case MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH:
>>> msr_info->data = lbr_desc->records.nr;
>>> return 0;
>>> + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>>> + msr_info->data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL);
>>> + return 0;
>>> default:
>>> if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>>> (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
>>> @@ -455,6 +489,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>> */
>>> wrmsrl(MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH, lbr_desc->records.nr);
>>> return 0;
>>> + case MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL:
>>> + if (!arch_lbr_ctl_is_valid(vcpu, data))
>>> + break;
>>> +
>>> + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, data);
>>> +
>>> + if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) && !lbr_desc->event &&
>>> + (data & ARCH_LBR_CTL_LBREN))
>>> + intel_pmu_create_guest_lbr_event(vcpu);
>>> + return 0;
>>> default:
>>> if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>>> (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
>>> @@ -668,12 +712,16 @@ static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu)
>>> */
>>> static void intel_pmu_legacy_freezing_lbrs_on_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu)
>>> {
>>> - u64 data = vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL);
>>> + u32 lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL;
>>> - if (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI) {
>>> - data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
>>> - vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
>>> - }
>>> + if (!(vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) &
>>> DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&
>>> + guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>> + lbr_ctl_field = GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL;
>>> +
>>> + vmcs_write64(lbr_ctl_field, vmcs_read64(lbr_ctl_field) & ~0x1ULL);
>>> }
>>> static void intel_pmu_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>> index 04d170c4b61e..73961fcfb62d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>> @@ -2022,6 +2022,13 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>> struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>> VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS)
>>> get_vmcs12(vcpu)->guest_ia32_debugctl = data;
>>> + /*
>>> + * For Arch LBR, IA32_DEBUGCTL[bit 0] has no meaning.
>>> + * It can be written to 0 or 1, but reads will always
>>> return 0.
>>> + */
>>> + if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>> + data &= ~DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR;
>>> +
>>> vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
>>> if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(vcpu) &&
>>> !to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc.event &&
>>> (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR))
>>> @@ -4548,6 +4555,11 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu, bool init_event)
>>> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD, vcpu);
>>> vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
>>> +
>>> + if (!init_event) {
>>> + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>> + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> static void vmx_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists