[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220429094355.122389-26-chenzhongjin@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:43:43 +0800
From: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <jthierry@...hat.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <masahiroy@...nel.org>, <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <ycote@...hat.com>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <ardb@...nel.org>, <maz@...nel.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
<chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 25/37] arm64: bpf: Skip validation of ___bpf_prog_run
There is a jump table encoded in ___bpf_prog_run and objtool-arm64
can't deal with it now. Skip validate it for arm64.
Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 13e9dbeeedf3..d702f1d83176 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2022,6 +2022,9 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
BUG_ON(1);
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(___bpf_prog_run);
+#endif
#define PROG_NAME(stack_size) __bpf_prog_run##stack_size
#define DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN(stack_size) \
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists