linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 08/33] bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220429104052.585495115@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:41:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 08/33] bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.

From: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>

commit 34d3a78c681e8e7844b43d1a2f4671a04249c821 upstream.

Tag the return type of {per, this}_cpu_ptr with RDONLY_MEM. The
returned value of this pair of helpers is kernel object, which
can not be updated by bpf programs. Previously these two helpers
return PTR_OT_MEM for kernel objects of scalar type, which allows
one to directly modify the memory. Now with RDONLY_MEM tagging,
the verifier will reject programs that write into RDONLY_MEM.

Fixes: 63d9b80dcf2c ("bpf: Introducte bpf_this_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()")
Fixes: 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211217003152.48334-8-haoluo@google.com
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.15.x
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c  |    4 ++--
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_per_cpu_ptr, const void *
 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_per_cpu_ptr_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_per_cpu_ptr,
 	.gpl_only	= false,
-	.ret_type	= RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL,
+	.ret_type	= RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_RDONLY,
 	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID,
 	.arg2_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_this_cpu_ptr, const void
 const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_this_cpu_ptr_proto = {
 	.func		= bpf_this_cpu_ptr,
 	.gpl_only	= false,
-	.ret_type	= RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID,
+	.ret_type	= RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID | MEM_RDONLY,
 	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID,
 };
 
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4166,15 +4166,30 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_v
 				mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
 			}
 		}
-	} else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_MEM) {
+	} else if (base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_MEM) {
+		bool rdonly_mem = type_is_rdonly_mem(reg->type);
+
+		if (type_may_be_null(reg->type)) {
+			verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno,
+				reg_type_str(env, reg->type));
+			return -EACCES;
+		}
+
+		if (t == BPF_WRITE && rdonly_mem) {
+			verbose(env, "R%d cannot write into %s\n",
+				regno, reg_type_str(env, reg->type));
+			return -EACCES;
+		}
+
 		if (t == BPF_WRITE && value_regno >= 0 &&
 		    is_pointer_value(env, value_regno)) {
 			verbose(env, "R%d leaks addr into mem\n", value_regno);
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
+
 		err = check_mem_region_access(env, regno, off, size,
 					      reg->mem_size, false);
-		if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
+		if (!err && value_regno >= 0 && (t == BPF_READ || rdonly_mem))
 			mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
 	} else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) {
 		enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE;
@@ -6370,6 +6385,13 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag;
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = tsize;
 		} else {
+			/* MEM_RDONLY may be carried from ret_flag, but it
+			 * doesn't apply on PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Fold it, otherwise
+			 * it will confuse the check of PTR_TO_BTF_ID in
+			 * check_mem_access().
+			 */
+			ret_flag &= ~MEM_RDONLY;
+
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | ret_flag;
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].btf = meta.ret_btf;
 			regs[BPF_REG_0].btf_id = meta.ret_btf_id;
@@ -9172,7 +9194,7 @@ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verif
 
 	if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_BTF_ID) {
 		dst_reg->type = aux->btf_var.reg_type;
-		switch (dst_reg->type) {
+		switch (base_type(dst_reg->type)) {
 		case PTR_TO_MEM:
 			dst_reg->mem_size = aux->btf_var.mem_size;
 			break;
@@ -11313,7 +11335,7 @@ static int check_pseudo_btf_id(struct bp
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto err_put;
 		}
-		aux->btf_var.reg_type = PTR_TO_MEM;
+		aux->btf_var.reg_type = PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY;
 		aux->btf_var.mem_size = tsize;
 	} else {
 		aux->btf_var.reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID;