[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmvIZG5Ke6vElb/e@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:13:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, jthierry@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, ycote@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
mark.rutland@....com, davem@...emloft.net, ardb@...nel.org,
maz@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 25/37] arm64: bpf: Skip validation of
___bpf_prog_run
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 05:43:43PM +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote:
> There is a jump table encoded in ___bpf_prog_run and objtool-arm64
> can't deal with it now. Skip validate it for arm64.
But, but, but, an earlier patch did -fno-jump-tables!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 13e9dbeeedf3..d702f1d83176 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -2022,6 +2022,9 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
> BUG_ON(1);
> return 0;
> }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> +STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(___bpf_prog_run);
> +#endif
>
> #define PROG_NAME(stack_size) __bpf_prog_run##stack_size
> #define DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN(stack_size) \
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists