linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for Silicon Mitus SM5703 regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YmvT/LL+1jB8xK77@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:03:08 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: regulator: Add bindings for Silicon
 Mitus SM5703 regulators

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 02:51:03PM +0300, Markuss Broks wrote:
> On 4/29/22 14:48, Mark Brown wrote:

> > As Rob said please send an incremental patch with any fixes needed.

> I'm sorry, I didn't understand it correctly. Does "incremental patch" mean I
> should send a separate follow-up patch with those fixes?

Yes.  It means on top of what's already applied.

Please also don't label patches that aren't part of a patch series as
though they were in a series, it just creates confusion.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)