[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8eafa7d7-511d-bc05-ad1d-3542d17c073a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:14:42 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ryder.lee@...iatek.com, daniel@...rotopia.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt7622: specify the number of DMA requests
Hi Rui,
On 29/04/2022 15:05, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Hi, Matthias,
>
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 12:57, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>
> Would this and the cache topology patch qualify as stable material?
> Intuitively, I'd say yes, but I'm not really sure.
>
my understanding is that these fix some warning, but no real bug in the sense
something does not work without them. So no I don't think they are stable material.
Regards,
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists