lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8eafa7d7-511d-bc05-ad1d-3542d17c073a@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:14:42 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ryder.lee@...iatek.com, daniel@...rotopia.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt7622: specify the number of DMA requests

Hi Rui,

On 29/04/2022 15:05, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Hi, Matthias,
> 
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 12:57, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
> 
> Would this and the cache topology patch qualify as stable material?
> Intuitively, I'd say yes, but I'm not really sure.
> 

my understanding is that these fix some warning, but no real bug in the sense 
something does not work without them. So no I don't think they are stable material.

Regards,
Matthias

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ