[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOUHufbPoxd=GrYR721dcrgf58UH1kqBp3X74Cw-OtdeTdiBWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 01:34:58 -0700
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
To: zhong jiang <zhongjiang-ali@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michael Larabel <Michael@...haellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Page Reclaim v2 <page-reclaim@...gle.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
Jan Alexander Steffens <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Steven Barrett <steven@...uorix.net>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@....edu>,
Donald Carr <d@...os-reins.com>,
Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@...dex.ru>,
Shuang Zhai <szhai2@...rochester.edu>,
Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@....works>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: support page table walks
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 7:10 AM zhong jiang
<zhongjiang-ali@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022/4/7 11:15 上午, Yu Zhao wrote:
...
> > + while (!mm && mm_state->head != &mm_list->fifo) {
> > + mm = list_entry(mm_state->head, struct mm_struct, lru_gen.list);
> > +
> > + mm_state->head = mm_state->head->next;
> > +
> > + /* full scan for those added after the last iteration */
> > + if (!mm_state->tail || mm_state->tail == &mm->lru_gen.list) {
> > + mm_state->tail = mm_state->head;
> > + walk->full_scan = true;
> > + }
> > +
>
> The full_scan seems to be alway true. because mm_state->tail points to
> the first item in mm_list, hence the walker's
>
> condition mm_state->tail == &mm->lru_gen.list alway equal. Am I missing
> something?
mm_state->tail points to the first item *added after the last
iteration*. If no new items, mm_state->tail parks at mm_list->fifo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists