[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ym0UWja2L40QbgEc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:50:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] objtool: Fix SLS checks
Fix the SLS validation; not having a next instruction is also a fail
when the next instruction should be INSN_TRAP.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 3f6785415894..3354101ffe34 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -3380,7 +3380,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
case INSN_RETURN:
if (sls && !insn->retpoline_safe &&
- next_insn && next_insn->type != INSN_TRAP) {
+ (!next_insn || (next_insn && next_insn->type != INSN_TRAP))) {
WARN_FUNC("missing int3 after ret",
insn->sec, insn->offset);
}
@@ -3428,7 +3428,7 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func,
case INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC:
if (sls && !insn->retpoline_safe &&
- next_insn && next_insn->type != INSN_TRAP) {
+ (!next_insn || (next_insn && next_insn->type != INSN_TRAP))) {
WARN_FUNC("missing int3 after indirect jump",
insn->sec, insn->offset);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists